End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia. / Andersen, Tea Sindbæk; Dedovic, Ismar.

I: Nationalities Papers, Bind 49, Nr. 4, 2021, s. 646-661.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Andersen, TS & Dedovic, I 2021, 'End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia', Nationalities Papers, bind 49, nr. 4, s. 646-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.66

APA

Andersen, T. S., & Dedovic, I. (2021). End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia. Nationalities Papers, 49(4), 646-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.66

Vancouver

Andersen TS, Dedovic I. End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia. Nationalities Papers. 2021;49(4):646-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.66

Author

Andersen, Tea Sindbæk ; Dedovic, Ismar. / End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia. I: Nationalities Papers. 2021 ; Bind 49, Nr. 4. s. 646-661.

Bibtex

@article{6ffbda1c9c444a5ab8262970c481048b,
title = "End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia",
abstract = "This article investigates the role of 1918, the end of the First World War, and the establishment of the Yugoslav state in public memories of post-communist Croatia and Serbia. Analysing history schoolbooks within the context of major works of history and public discussion, the authors trace the developments of public memory of the end of the war and 1918. Drawing on the concepts of public memory and historical narrative, the authors focus on the ways in which history textbooks create historical narratives and on the types of lessons from the past that can be extracted from these narratives. While Serbia and Croatia have rather different patterns of First World War memory, the authors argue that both states have abandoned the Yugoslav communist narrative and now publicly commemorate 1918 as a loss of national statehood. This is somehow paradoxical, since the establishment of the South Slav State in 1918 was supposedly an outcome of the Wilsonian principle of national self-determination. In Serbia, the story of loss is packed in a fatalistic narrative of heroism and victimhood, while in Croatia the story of loss is embedded in a tale of necessary evils, which nevertheless had a positive outcome in a sovereign Croatian state.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, South Eastern Europe, Public memory, Historical narratives, First World War, 1918, Yugoslavia",
author = "Andersen, {Tea Sindb{\ae}k} and Ismar Dedovic",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1017/nps.2020.66",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "646--661",
journal = "Nationalities Papers",
issn = "0090-5992",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - End of War or End of State? 1918 in the Public Memories of Post-Communist Croatia and Serbia

AU - Andersen, Tea Sindbæk

AU - Dedovic, Ismar

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This article investigates the role of 1918, the end of the First World War, and the establishment of the Yugoslav state in public memories of post-communist Croatia and Serbia. Analysing history schoolbooks within the context of major works of history and public discussion, the authors trace the developments of public memory of the end of the war and 1918. Drawing on the concepts of public memory and historical narrative, the authors focus on the ways in which history textbooks create historical narratives and on the types of lessons from the past that can be extracted from these narratives. While Serbia and Croatia have rather different patterns of First World War memory, the authors argue that both states have abandoned the Yugoslav communist narrative and now publicly commemorate 1918 as a loss of national statehood. This is somehow paradoxical, since the establishment of the South Slav State in 1918 was supposedly an outcome of the Wilsonian principle of national self-determination. In Serbia, the story of loss is packed in a fatalistic narrative of heroism and victimhood, while in Croatia the story of loss is embedded in a tale of necessary evils, which nevertheless had a positive outcome in a sovereign Croatian state.

AB - This article investigates the role of 1918, the end of the First World War, and the establishment of the Yugoslav state in public memories of post-communist Croatia and Serbia. Analysing history schoolbooks within the context of major works of history and public discussion, the authors trace the developments of public memory of the end of the war and 1918. Drawing on the concepts of public memory and historical narrative, the authors focus on the ways in which history textbooks create historical narratives and on the types of lessons from the past that can be extracted from these narratives. While Serbia and Croatia have rather different patterns of First World War memory, the authors argue that both states have abandoned the Yugoslav communist narrative and now publicly commemorate 1918 as a loss of national statehood. This is somehow paradoxical, since the establishment of the South Slav State in 1918 was supposedly an outcome of the Wilsonian principle of national self-determination. In Serbia, the story of loss is packed in a fatalistic narrative of heroism and victimhood, while in Croatia the story of loss is embedded in a tale of necessary evils, which nevertheless had a positive outcome in a sovereign Croatian state.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - South Eastern Europe

KW - Public memory

KW - Historical narratives

KW - First World War

KW - 1918

KW - Yugoslavia

U2 - 10.1017/nps.2020.66

DO - 10.1017/nps.2020.66

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 646

EP - 661

JO - Nationalities Papers

JF - Nationalities Papers

SN - 0090-5992

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 274840751